This was on Obama's Web Site and ONLY after many complaints it was taken down!

By Kate Smythe-Blake - Jul 19th, 2008 at 10:23 pm EDT

Comments | Mail to a Friend | Report Objectionable Content

The kike filth are trying to steal this election from us. But this is our time. The kike live in fear of peace. They fear happiness. The thought of people living happily in peace without killing each other frightens the horde of kike that runs our government. But when pieces of kike use their kike manipulation tactics to stop Barack, it is time to strike back. There is nothing a kike army can do when faced with progressive people who are determined to achieve peace. We will achieve lasting peace.

It is admittedly to the credit of the people who commented on the posting, however, that they took exception to it. The comments suggest that it was in fact reported to the administrators, who did not act on the complaints.

...UPDATE: THE POSTING IN QUESTION WAS DELETED WITHIN 4 HOURS OF THIS PIECE’S APPEARANCE AT ISRAPUNDIT (AND NOWHERE ELSE). This shows that Obama’s campaign has people whose job is to watch this site because it is obviously effective. Note also that the posting was not deleted until it was re-posted outside the Obama site.

Gen. Clark is an IDIOT

OK, Gen. - Why were you fired from NATO? Why didn't your men like or respect you? Why did you INCINERATE 82 Men, Women, Children in WACO?

The other side of RACE

Barack says we need to have a conversation about race in America.?

Fair enough. But this time, it has to be a two-way conversation. White America needs to be heard from, not just lectured to.

This time, the Silent Majority needs to have its convictions, grievances and demands heard. And among them are these:

First, America has been the best country on earth for black folks. It was here that 600,000 black people, brought from Africa in slave ships, grew into a community of 40 million, were introduced to Christian salvation, and reached the greatest levels of freedom and prosperity blacks have ever known.

Wright ought to go down on his knees and thank God he is an American.

Second, no people anywhere has done more to lift up blacks than white Americans. Untold trillions have been spent since the '60s on welfare, food stamps, rent supplements, Section 8 housing, Pell grants, student loans, legal services, Medicaid, Earned Income Tax Credits and poverty programs designed to bring the African-American community into the mainstream.

Governments, businesses and colleges have engaged in discrimination against white folks -- with affirmative action, contract set-asides and quotas -- to advance black applicants over white applicants.

Churches, foundations, civic groups, schools and individuals all over America have donated time and money to support soup kitchens, adult education, day care, retirement and nursing homes for blacks.

We hear the grievances. Where is the gratitude??

Barack talks about new 'ladders of opportunity' for blacks.

Let him go to Altoona?and Johnstown, and ask the white kids in Catholic schools how many were visited lately by Ivy League recruiters handing out scholarships for 'deserving' white kids.?

Is white America really responsible for the fact that the crime and incarceration rates for African-Americans are seven times those of white America? Is it really white America 's fault that illegitimacy in the African-American community has hit 70 percent and the black dropout rate from high schools in some cities has reached 50 percent?

Is that the fault of white America or, first and foremost, a failure of the black community itself?

As for racism, its ugliest manifestation is in interracial crime, and especially interracial crimes of violence. Is Barack Obama aware that while white criminals choose black victims 3 percent of the time, black criminals choose white victims 45 percent of the time?

Is Barack aware that black-on-white rapes are 100 times more common than the reverse, that black-on-white robberies were 139 times as common in the first three years of this decade as the reverse?

We have all heard ad nauseam from the Rev. Al about Tawana Brawley, the Duke rape case and Jena. And all turned out to be hoaxes. But about the epidemic of black assaults on whites that are real, we hear nothing.

Sorry, Barack, some of us have heard it all before, about 40 years and 40 trillion tax dollars ago.

They HATE

Just LOOK at this - disgusting - Please cut and paste the address in your window. Thanks

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FDVaJXmCIjk

Palestine?

Dennis Miller (and he is not Jewish) recently said the following about the Mid East situation:
"A brief overview of the situation is always valuable, so as a service to all Americans who still don't get it, I now offer you the story of the Middle East in just a few paragraphs, Which is all you really need.
Here we go: The Palestinians want their own country. There's just one thing about that: There are no Palestinians. It's a made up word. Israel was called Palestine for two thousand years. "Palestinian" sounds ancient But is really a modern invention. Before the Israelis won the land in the 1967 war, Gaza was owned by Egypt, the West Bank was owned by Jordan, And there were no "Palestinians." As soon as the Jews took over and started growing Oranges as big as basketballs, what do you know, say hello to the "Palestinians, "weeping for their deep bond with their lost "land" and "nation." So for the sake of honesty, let's not use the word "Palestinian" anymore to describe these delightful folks, who dance for joy at our deaths, until someone points out they're being taped. Instead, let's call them what they are: "Other Arabs Who Can't Accomplish Anything In Life and Would Rather Wrap Themselves In The Seductive Melodrama Of Eternal Struggle And Death." I know that's a bit unwieldy to expect to see on CNN. How about this, then: "Adjacent Jew-Haters." Okay, so the Adjacent Jew-Haters want their own country. Oops, just one more thing. No, they don't. They could've had their own country any time in the last thirty years, Especially two years ago at Camp David. But if you have your own country, you have to have traffic lights and garbage trucks and Chambers of Commerce, and, worse, you actually have to figure out some way to make a living. That's no fun. No, they want what all the other Jew-Haters in the region want: Israel. They also want a big pile of dead Jews, of course - that's where the real fun is -- but mostly they want Israel. Why? For one thing, trying to destroy Israel - or "The Zionist Entity" As their textbooks call it For the last fifty years has allowed the rulers of Arab countries to divert the attention of their own people away from the fact that they're the blue-ribbon most illiterate, poorest, and tribally backward on God's Earth, and if you've ever been around God's Earth . . You know that's really saying something. It makes me roll my eyes every time one of our pundits waxes poetic about the great history and culture of the Muslim Middle East. Unless I'm missing something, the Arabs haven't given anything to the World since Algebra, and, by the way, thanks a hell of a lot for that
One.Chew this around & spit it out: 500 million Arabs; 5 million Jews. Think of all the Arab countries as a football field, and Israel as a pack of matches sitting in the middle of it And now these same folks swear that, if Israel gives them half of that pack of matches, everyone will be pals.. Really? Wow, what neat news. Hey, but what about the string of wars to obliterate the tiny country and the constant din of rabid blood oaths to drive every Jew into the sea? Oh, that? We were just kidding. A number of people made a gorgeous point the other day: Just reverse the Numbers. Imagine 500 million Jews and 5 million Arabs. I was stunned at the simple brilliance of it . Can anyone picture the Jews strapping belts of razor blades and dynamite to themselves? Of course not. Or marshaling every fiber and force at their disposal for generations to drive a tiny Arab State into the sea? Nonsense. Or dancing for joy at the murder of innocents? Impossible - Or spreading and believing horrible lies about the Jews baking their Bread with the blood of children? Disgusting. No, as you know, left to themselves in a world of peace, The worst Jews would ever do to people is debate them to death. Mr. Bush, God bless him, is walking a tightrope. I understand that, with vital operations in Iraq and others, it's in our interest, as Americans, to try to stabilize our Arab allies as much as possible, and, after all, that can't be much harder than stabilizing a roomful of Super models who've just had their drugs taken away. However, in any big-picture strategy, there's always a danger of losing moral weight. We've already lost some. After September 11th, our president told us and the world he was going to root out all terrorists and the countries that supported them. Beautiful.

Then the Israelis, after months and months of having the equivalent of an Oklahoma City every week (and then every day), start to do the same thing we did, and we tell them to show restraint. If America were being attacked with an Oklahoma City every day, we would all very shortly be screaming for the administration to just be done with it and kill everything south of the Mediterranean and east of the Jordan.

ISLAM is a Trojan Horse

Islam Is a Trojan Horse
Religion Amil Imani, Featured WriterApril 18, 2008

“Europe will be Muslim in a dozen years,” promises the Islamic Republic of Iran’s Supreme Guide (dictator) who is racing full-speed ahead to make as many bombs as possible with long-range missiles capable of delivering their payload anywhere in the world.

This past Friday, Yunis al-Astal, a leading Muslim cleric and Hamas member of the Palestinian parliament, declared on Hamas' Al-Aqsa TV that "the capital of the Catholics, or the Crusader capital," would soon be conquered by Islam and Rome become an advance post for the Islamic conquests, which will spread through Europe in its entirety, and then will turn to the two Americas.”

The Islam hydra, with Saudi Arabia and the oil-money bloated Emirs and Sheiks of the Persian Gulf leading the Sunni charge from one side and the end-of-the-worlder bomb-seeking Shiite of the Islamic Republic of Iran with its proxies of Hamas, Lebanon Hezbollah and the Sadrists in Iraq closing from the other side will devour the free world.

Free people: are you listening?
Free people: do you care?
Free people: are you doing anything?

Disguised as religion, Islam has penetrated the democracies with the aim of replacing civility and liberty with the barbarism of theocracy and Sharia. Islam’s multi-prong attack aims to destroy all that liberty offers.

It is generally assumed that religion addresses issues of importance to daily life as well as matters that transcend it. Religion claims to exercise a civilizing influence by ordering the social life and promoting spirituality, as well as advancing an array of human virtues. Zoroaster, for instance, based his faith on the triad of goodly thoughts, goodly speech and goodly deeds. Moses framed the fundamentals of his faith in the Ten Commandments, and Jesus placed love at the core of his faith.

Yet, all is not well with religion. Purveyors of some religions advocate and promote ideas and practices that are harmful to the general well-being of mankind. It is imperative that a society institutes measures that guard against any and all organizations and ideologies, be they religious or otherwise that harms it.

As things stand now, our lives are governed by numerous boards at all levels of government, business, and community. All these boards are charged with the responsibility of looking after the welfare of the people they serve. The Food and Drug Administration, for instance, must pass on the safety and quality of the food we eat; the Aviation Safety Board works to ensure safe flights; a local school board strives to create the environment that best serves the education and safety needs of the pupils. Every community and business of any size is served by boards.

There are, however, no oversight boards that would check against things that contaminate the mind and present a clear threat of unraveling our democracy’s social compact as we know and cherish it. Shouldn’t these dangers to our beliefs and way of life be monitored and combated or should they be given a pass to work their damage?

Presently, America is faced with a formidable enemy in a Trojan horse called Islam. This imminent danger makes it imperative to revisit the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and make the necessary changes to legally defeat Islam’s subversion of the democratic system.

Muslims in Western democracies, most of them escapees of the misery of Islamic countries, exhibit such incredible gall and audacity as to shamelessly demand that their benevolent hosts surrender their liberty and legalize and adopt the Sharia in their societies.

The Muslims’ presence in countries such as Canada, Great Britain, the Netherlands and Sweden represents the tip of the sword of the Islamists protruding from the Trojan horse.

Once Sharia is recognized to any extent, it will reach out to rule, not only on matters that concern Muslims, but also those that may involve a Muslim and non-Muslim. Under Sharia, a Muslim man married to a non-Muslim woman is able to divorce the woman at will and automatically have custody of the children.

America, with a long history of protecting religious freedom, still clings to the “hands off” practice of leaving alone any doctrine or practice billed as religion. A thorny problem is in deciding what constitutes a religion and who is to make that call. The dictionary supplies a sociologically useless definition for religion: “The expression of man’s belief in and reverence for a superhuman power recognized as the creator and governor of the universe.” Just about anyone or any group under this definition can start a religion, and they indeed do—and some do so at significant costs to others.

Islam was birthed by primitives of some 1400 years ago and over time invaded much of the world at the point of the sword. Presently, Islamists, with their treasuries flush with petrodollars, are in a great position to realize their perennial dream of bringing the world under the rule of Muhammad’s Ummeh.

On the one hand, Pakistan is already a nuclear power and the Islamic Republic of Iran aims to be one before very long. On the other hand, Muslim governments and wealthy Sheikhs are funding Islamic schools, centers and front organizations in the West to work from within at the unraveling of the non-Islamic democratic systems. In a parallel attack, the “Legal Islam” is exploiting every provision of the law in free societies to promote Islam and silence its critics through expensive legal shenanigans.

Islam is incompatible with democracy and subversive of the way of life that blesses this nation. It is imperative that we fight Islamofascism with the same determination that we fought other enemies of freedom such as Nazism, Fascism, and Communism. It is, therefore, imperative that the Constitution be revisited in such a manner that it no longer grants a pass to any cult simply calling itself a religion.

Bluntly speaking, no one can be a faithful Muslim and an American at the same time. As more and more Muslims arrive in non-Islamic lands, as they reproduce with great fecundity, as they convert the disenchanted and minorities, and as petrodollar-flush Muslims and Muslim treasuries supply generous funds, Muslims gather more power to undermine the democratic rule.

The hydra of Islam is lashing out by its jihadists, sophisticated and well-funded lawyers, terrorist groups, and terror-sponsoring governments who have the bomb and those that are racing non-stop to acquire the ultimate weapon. There is no time to waste. Steadfastly confronting Islam is the only way to defeat a fanatical enemy who does not believe in negotiation or compromise. For Islam, it is winner take all. And the way that permissive, oblivious, and well-meaning free societies are reacting does not bode well for liberty.

Islam must be recognized for what it is: a Trojan horse carrying in its belly what will assuredly slaughter all who stand everything that is precious to free people.
Amil Imani is an Iranian-born American citizen and pro-democracy activist residing in the United States of America. Imani is a columnist, literary translator, novelist and an essayist who has been writing and speaking out for the struggling people of his native land, Iran. He and his family escaped Iran after the radical Islamic revolution. He maintains a website at www.amilimani.com.

Obama & Israel

Obama and Israel

Washington, D.C. (February 25, 2008) --

After remarks made by Ralph Nader yesterday on "Meet the Press," Republican Jewish Coalition Executive Director Matt Brooks said, "Ralph Nader added to the debate on Senator Obama's views on Israel and the Middle East and raised serious doubts and questions about the true leanings of Senator Obama on these important issues."

During his interview on "Meet the Press," Nader said that Sen. Obama had reversed his positions on Israel. Nader said Sen. Obama's "better instincts and his knowledge have been censored by himself" and that Sen. Obama was "pro-Palestinian when he was in Illinois before he ran for the state Senate" and "during the state Senate." Sen. Obama has caught criticism for pro-Palestinian, anti-Israel statements and sentiments before. In March 2007, Sen. Obama was criticized for saying that "Nobody is suffering more than the Palestinians." Obama has also been criticized for stocking his campaign with several controversial advisors including Zbigniew Brzezinski, Robert Malley, Samantha Power and Susan Rice. "People should be very skeptical of Barack Obama's shaky Middle East policies. When a long-time political activist like Ralph Nader, with a well-documented, anti-Israel bias, claims that Senator Obama shares this anti-Israel bias, that is alarming," said RJC Executive Director Matt Brooks. "If Senator Obama supports Ralph Nader's policies, which consistently condemn Israel's right to defend itself against terrorism, and if Sen. Obama has only reversed his positions to run for president, it once again raises serious questions about his grasp of the geo-political realities of the Middle East and puts into doubt his commitment to the safety and security of Israel. These are important questions we in the Jewish community will be asking."

Michelle Obama

In her senior thesis at Princeton, Michele Obama, the wife of Barack Obama stated that America was a nation founded on "crime and hatred". Moreover, she stated that whites in America were "ineradicably racist". The 1985 thesis, titled "Princeton-Educated Blacks and the Black Community" was written under her maiden name, Michelle LaVaughn Robinson.

Michelle Obama stated in her thesis that to "Whites at Princeton, it often seems as if, to them, she will always be Black first..." However, it was reported by a fellow black classmate, "If those "Whites at Princeton" really saw Michelle as one who always would "be Black first," it seems that she gave them that impression".

Most alarming is Michele Obama's use of the terms "separationist" and "integrationist" when describing the views of black people.
Mrs. Obama clearly identifies herself with a "separationist" view of race.
"By actually working with the Black lower class or within their communities as a result of their ideologies, a separationist may betterunderstand the desperation of their situation and feel more hopeless about a resolution as opposed to an integrationist who is ignorant totheir plight."
Obama writes that the path she chose by attending Princeton would likely lead to her "further integration and/or assimilation into a white cultural and social structure that will only allow me to remain on the periphery of society; never becoming a full participant."
Michele Obama clearly has a chip on her shoulder.
Not only does she see separate black and white societies in America, but she elevates black over white in her world.

Here is another passage that is uncomfortable and ominous in meaning:
"There was no doubt in my mind that as a member of the black community, I am obligated to this community and will utilize all of my present and future resources to benefit the black community first and foremost. "
What is Michelle Obama planning to do with her future resources if she's first lady that will elevate black over white in?America?
The following passage appears to be a call to arms for affirmative action policies that could be the hallmark of an Obama administration.
"Predominately white universities like Princeton are socially and academically designed to cater to the needs of the white students comprising the bulk of their enrollments."
The conclusion of her thesis is alarming.
Michelle Obama's poll of black alumni concludes that other black students at Princeton do not share her obsession with blackness. But rather than celebrate, she is horrified that black alumni identify with our common American culture more than they value the color of their skin. "I hoped that these findings would help me conclude that despite the high degree of identification with whites as a result of the educational and occupational path that black Princeton alumni follow, the alumni would still maintain a certain level of identification with the black community. However, these findings do not support this possibility."
Is it no wonder that most black alumni ignored her racist questionnaire Only 89 students responded out of 400 who were asked for input.
Michelle Obama does not look into a crowd of Obama supporters and see Americans. She sees black people and white people eternally conflicted with one another.
The thesis provides a trove of Mrs. Obama's thoughts and world view seen through a race-based prism.
This is a very divisive view for a potential first lady that would do untold damage to race relations in this country in a Barack Obama administration.
Michelle Obama's intellectually refined racism should give all Americans pause for deep concern.
Now maybe she's changed, but she sure sounds like someone with an axe to grind with America. Will the press let Michelle get a free pass over her obviously racist comment about American whites I am sure that it will. But it shouldn't.
FYI:
I am definitely sick of the main stream media (MSM) feeding us all this crap about Obama being an agent of change.
Has anyone stopped to think what kind of change; really? I suggest we all remember the message in the novel Animal Farm by George Orwell. If you're not familiar with the novel, I highly recommend reading it.

A Black Writer about OBAMA

Subject: What A Black Columnist Has To Say About Obama.Ken Blackwell - Columnist for the New York Sun
It's an amazing time to be alive in America. We're in a year of firsts inthis presidential election: the first viable woman candidate; t he firstviable African-American candidate; and, a candidate who is the first frontrunning freedom fighter over 70. The next president of America will be afirst.We won't truly be in an election of firsts, however, until we judge everycandidate by where they stand. We won't arrive where we should be until weno longer talk about skin color or gender. Now that Barack Obama steps tothe front of the Democratic field, we need to stop talking about his race,and start talking about his policies and his politics.

The reality is this: Though the Democrats will not have a nominee until August, unless Hillary Clinton drops out, Mr. Obama is now the front runner, and its time America takes a closer and deeper look at him. Some pundits are calling him the next John F. Kennedy. He's not. He's the next George McGovern. And it's time people learned the facts. Because the truth is that Mr. Obama is the single most liberal senator in the entire U.S. Senate. He is more liberal than Ted Kennedy, Bernie Sanders,or Mrs. Clinton. Never in my life have I seen a presidential front runner whose rhetoric is so far removed from his record. Walter Mondale promised to raise our taxes, and he lost. George McGovern promised military weakness, and he lost. Michael Dukakis promised a liberal domestic agenda, and he lost. Yet Mr. Obama is promising all those things, and he's not behind in thepolls. Why? Because the press has dealt with him as if he were in a beautypageant. Mr. Obama talks about getting past party, getting past red and blue, to lead the United States of America. But let's look at the more defined strokes of who he is underneath this superficial "beauty."Start with national security, since the president's most important duties are as commander-in-chief. Over the summer, Mr. Obama talked about invadingPakistan, a nation armed with nuclear weapons; meeting without preconditionswith Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who vo ws to destroy Israel and create anotherHolocaust; and Kim Jong II, who is murdering and starving his people, butemphasized that the nuclear option was off the table against terrorists - something no president has ever taken off the table since we created nuclearweapons in the 1940s. Even Democrats who have worked in national security condemned all of those remarks. Mr. Obama is a foreign-policy novice who would put our national security at risk.Next, consider economic policy. For all its faults, our health care system is the strongest in the world. And free trade agreements, created by BillClinton as well as President Bush, have made more goods more affordable so that even people of modest means can live a life that no one imagined a generation ago. Yet Mr. Obama promises to raise taxes on "the rich." How to fix Social Security? Raise taxes. How to fix Medicare? Raise taxes.Prescription drugs ? Raise taxes. Free college? Raise taxes. Socializemedicine? Raise taxes. His solution to everything is to have government takeit over. Big Brother on steroids, funded by your paycheck.Finally, look at the social issues. Mr. Obama had the audacity to open a stadium rally by saying, "All praise and glory to God!" but He says thatChristian leaders speaking for life and marriage have "hijacked" - "hijacked- Christianity". He is pro-partial birth abortion, and promises to appoint Supreme Court justices who will rule any restriction on it unconstitutional. He espouses the abortion views of Margaret Sanger, one of the early advocates of racial cleansing. His spiritual leaders endorse homosexual marriage, and he is moving in that direction. In Illinois, he refused to vote against a statewide ban - on all handguns in the state. These are radical left, Hollywood, and San Francisco values, not Middle America values. The real Mr. Obama is an easy target for the general election. Mrs. Clinton is a far tougher opponent. But Mr. Obama could win if people don't start looking behind his veneer and flowery speeches. His vision of "bringing America together" means saying that those who disagree with his agenda forAmerica are hijackers or war mongers. Uniting the country means adopting his liberal agenda and abandoning any conflicting beliefs. But right now everyone is talking about how eloquent of a speaker he is and- yes - they're talking about his race. Those should never be the factors on which we base our choice for president. Mr. Obama's radical agenda sets him far outside the American mainstream, to the left of Mrs. Clinton. It's time to talk about the real Barack Obama. In an election of firsts, let's first make sure we elect the person who is qualified to be our president in a nuclear age during a global civilizational war.NOTE the following:Subject: Kind of scary, you think, at least from a Biblical perspective.Remember--God is good, and is in time, on time--every time.According to The Book of Revelations the anti-Christ is:The anti-Christ will be a man, in his 40s, of MUSLIM descent, who will deceive the nations with persuasive language, and have a MASSIVE Christ-like appeal....the prophecy says that people will flock to him and he will promise false hope and world peace, and when he is in power, will destroy everything. Is it OBAMA? maybe, maybe-not. I STRONGLY URGE each one of you to send this as many times as you can! Each opportunity that you have to send it to a friend or media outlet...do it!If you think I am crazy..I'm sorry but I refuse to take a chance on the"unknown"

Israel & Gaza

Most people in the Western world spent at least some of their education being taught about the Holocaust. We know some of the details of the tragedy, some of the methods, and that 6,000,000 Jews were executed, their only crime; being Jewish. Yet today, just 60 years later, we allow odious men such as UN Human Rights Council members Richard Falk and Renee Zieglerto belittle the suffering of the Jewish people at the hands of the Nazis, by comparing it to the situation of the Palestinians in Gaza. They call Gaza a concentration camp, and the Israeli soldiers who protect the borders concentration camp guards. Frankly I do not see how one can make a comparison between the two, and I would ask anyone who supports their assertion these questions. Where are the gas chambers in Gaza? Where are the furnaces to incinerate the bodies of the millions of dead? Where are the starvation and the disease? Where are the Israeli scientists torturing Gazans in sadistic experiments? Where are the daily trainloads of Palestinians being brought to Gaza to be slaughtered? The answer, of course, to all of these questions is: “In Auschwitz, in Treblinka and in Buchenwald, but not in Gaza”. For these things were the hallmarks of the Holocaust, not the actions of Israel and its soldiers.
So here we find ourselves, just 60 years on, listening to sickening comparisons between the abomination of the Holocaust, and the blockade of the Palestinians in Gaza. And we must ask ourselves a question: Are we prepared to continue the belittling of the Holocaust until the horrors committed during it no longer mean anything to us? For there can be no doubt that, for every public figure who denies the Holocaust, or compares it to something which does not even approach the suffering of the Jews, the world detaches itself a little more from understanding the true inhumanity of the Nazis. This is doubly so for UN officials, representatives of a body created to protect the world from a repeat of the Nazi regime and their evil actions. Their words carry far more weight than normal people, because they represent the body designed to prevent a repeat of the Holocaust. “If even they belittle the Holocaust”, people will ask themselves, “perhaps the Holocaust wasn’t as bad as some people make it out to be”. Is this what the UN is hoping to achieve, for people to question the suffering of the Jews during the Holocaust? If you listen to some of its members it becomes clear that this assertion may not be so far-fetched. The President of your member state, Iran, has repeatedly denied the extent of the Holocaust, if not the existence of the event itself. Yet what has the UN done to censure him, and others like him? Nothing. His representative still sits in the General Assembly, safe in the knowledge that his leader can publicly say whatever he likes, so long, it seems, as it is aimed at the Jews.
The UN, then, has a decision to make. Does it agree with the assessments of Falk and Ziegler? Does it agree that Gaza today resembles a Nazi concentration camp? Or, does it see that there can be no comparison between the systematic extermination of the Jews in the concentration camps, and the blockade of the Palestinians in Gaza? If the answer is the latter Falk and Ziegler will be recognised as having attempted to belittle the suffering of the Jews during the Holocaust, removed from their positions and never allowed to represent the UN again. If the answer, however, is the former, then I begin to wonder what part the UN will play in the destruction of Israel.

Democrats and TAX'S

This is pretty straight forward and undisputable.....you read and you decide.Whether Democrat or Republican one might want to know just what the candidates have in mind for our personal money. That's what taxes are.....OUR $.
Proposed changes in taxes after 2008 General election:CAPITAL GAINS TAXMCCAIN 15% (no change)OBAMA 28% CLINTON 24% How does this affect you? If you sell your home and make a profit, you will pay 28% of your gain on taxes. If you are heading toward retirement and would like to down-size your home or move into a retirement community, 28% of the money you make from your home will go to taxes. This proposal will adversely affect the elderly who are counting on the income from their homes as part of their retirement income.DIVIDEND TAXMCCAIN 15% (no change)OBAMA 39.6% CLINTON 39.6% How will this affect you? If you have any money invested in stock market, IRA, mutual funds, college funds, life insurance, retirement accounts, or anything that pays or reinvests dividends, you will now be paying nearly 40% of the money earned on taxes if Obama or Clinton become president. The experts predict that "Higher tax rates on dividends and capital gains would crash the stock market yet do absolutely nothing to cut the deficit."INCOME TAXMCCAIN (no changes)Single making 30K - tax $4,500 Single making 50K - tax $12,500 Single making 75K - tax $18,750 Married making 60K- tax $9,000Married making 75K - tax $18,750 Married making 125K - tax $31,250OBAMA (reversion to pre-Bush tax cuts)Single making 30K - tax $8,400 Single making 50K - tax $14,000 Single making 75K - tax $23,250 Married making 60K - tax $16,800 Married making 75K - tax $21,000 Married making 125K - tax $38,750CLINTON (reversion to pre-Bush tax cuts)Single making 30K - tax $8,400 Single making 50K - tax $14,000 Single making 75K - tax $23,250 Married making 60K - tax $16,800 Married making 75K - tax $21,000 Married making 125K - tax $38,750 How does this affect you? No explanation needed. This is pretty straight forward.INHERITANCE TAXMCCAIN 0% (No change, Bush repealed this tax)OBAMA keep the inheritance taxCLINTON keep the inheritance taxHow does this affect you? Many families have lost businesses, farms and ranches, and homes that have been in their families for generations because they could not afford the inheritance tax. Those willing their assets to loved ones will not only lose them to these taxes.NEW TAXES BEING PROPOSED BY BOTH CLINTON AND OBAMA* New government taxes proposed on homes that are more than 2400 square feet* New gasoline taxes (as if gas weren't high enough already)* New taxes on natural resources consumption (heating gas, water, electricity)* New taxes on retirement accountsand last but not least....* New taxes to pay for socialized medicine so we can receive the same level of medical care as other third-world countries!!!

Rev. Wright

Did you see this one? The black man who hates "rich white" people, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright (Obama's friend and confessed mentor) is having a 10,000 + square foot home built by his church in a rich white gated neighborhood. I wonder if he'll have room for Obama in the basement when he loses his bid fo' da "White" House!

Here's the best part, it comes with a 10 million dollar line of credit!
And by the way, where is Uncle Al Sharpton and Jesse the Jackass Jackson. How come they aren't outraged at the comment, "garlic nosed Italians" by Mr. Wright? Hum? Or do they only get outraged at people like Imus for saying nappy headed hoes? I guess if you're black, you can insult anybody you like, do shady business deals, get 1.6 million dollar homes built for you with tax free church money, talk politics at the pulpit, and basically do what ever the hell else you want at the "rich white" tax payers expense!

YES I know HIM

I wondered.How would Barack explain to his press groupies why he sat silent in a pew for 20 years as the Rev. Jeremiah Wright delivered racist rants against white America for our maligning of Fidel and Gadhafi, and inventing AIDS to infect and kill black people?How would he justify not walking out as Wright spewed his venom about "the U.S. of K.K.K. America," and howled, "God damn America!" My hunch was right. Barack would turn the tables. Yes, Barack agreed, Wright's statements were "controversial," and "divisive," and "racially charged," reflecting a "distorted view of America." But we must understand the man in full and the black experience out of which the Rev. Wright came: 350 years of slavery and segregation. Barack then listed black grievances and informed us what white America must do to close the racial divide and heal the country.The "white community," said Barack, must start "acknowledging that what ails the African-American community does not just exist in the minds of black people; that the legacy of discrimination -- and current incidents of discrimination, while less overt than in the past -- are real and must be addressed. Not just with words, but with deeds ... ."And what deeds must we perform to heal ourselves and our country? The "white community" must invest more money in black schools and communities, enforce civil rights laws, ensure fairness in the criminal justice system and provide this generation of blacks with "ladders of opportunity" that were "unavailable" to Barack's and the Rev. Wright's generations. What is wrong with Barack's prognosis and Barack's cure?Only this: It is the same old con, the same old shakedown that black hustlers have been running since the Kerner Commission blamed the riots in Harlem, Watts, Newark, Detroit and a hundred other cities on, as Nixon put it, "everybody but the rioters themselves." Was "white racism" really responsible for those black men looting auto dealerships and liquor stories, and burning down their own communities, as Otto Kerner said -- that liberal icon until the feds put him away for bribery. Barack says we need to have a conversation about race in America. Fair enough. But this time, it has to be a two-way conversation. White America needs to be heard from, not just lectured to. This time, the Silent Majority needs to have its convictions, grievances and demands heard. And among them are these: First, America has been the best country on earth for black folks. It was here that 600,000 black people, brought from Africa in slave ships, grew into a community of 40 million, were introduced to Christian salvation, and reached the greatest levels of freedom and prosperity blacks have ever known. Wright ought to go down on his knees and thank God he is an American. Second, no people anywhere has done more to lift up blacks than white Americans. Untold trillions have been spent since the '60s on welfare, food stamps, rent supplements, Section 8 housing, Pell grants, student loans, legal services, Medicaid, Earned Income Tax Credits and poverty programs designed to bring the African-American community into the mainstream.

Do YOU know Obama?

If you say you don't like Obama then you're a RACIST - but if you like him then you're an ANTI-Semitic / I would rather be a RACIST.

The following is an e-mail that I checked and it is true! It speaks for itself!

This email speaks for itself.>> I have to tell you of an experience I had last night that was so anti Semitic and frightening: Last night I was honored by Kappa Alpha Psi fraternity, for my work with Children Uniting nations with African American children who are living out of home care. I have dedicated my life to saving these children from abuse, neglect and alife of crime. We created 'adoption day' and "Day of the child" determined to recruit caring adults to be mentors and life savers for our at risk children in the inner cities. The mayor was present and City council member Bernard Parks, assemblyman Mike Davis, Senator Mark Ridely Thomas etc. I was introduced as a children advocate and a leaderin the Jewish community. I began my speech by talking about how I woke up in the morning and listened to Hillary Clinton's speech, in the spirit of Dr. King from Memphis, that moved me so deeply. I expressed to the crowd how grateful I was to listen to Sen. McCain apologize to the community for mistakes he has made in the past. Iacknowledged Sen. Obama's speech from the campaign trail about Dr. King's mentorship.After I spoke and thanked the fraternity and their members, Rev. Eric Lee, pres. and CEO of Southern Christian Leadership Conference of greater Los Angeles, was introduced as the key note speaker. >>>> He began his speech by thanking Jesus for Obama, who is>> going to be the leader of the world. He continued by>> referring to other leaders Like Dr. King,being that this>> was the moment of celebrating Dr. King's spirit on the>> anniversary of his assasination, and Malcolm X.>>>> It was right after the mention of Malcolm X that he looked>> right at me and started talking about the African American>> children who are suffering because of the JEWS that have>> featured them as rapists and murderers. He spoke of a>> Jewish Rabbi, and then corrected himself to say "What>> other kind of Rabbis are there, but JEWS". He told how>> this Rabbi came to him to say that he would like to bring>> the AA community and the Jewish community together. ">> NO, NO, NO,!!!!" he shouted into the crowd, we are not>> going to come together. "The Jews have made money on us>> in the music business and we are the entertainers, and they>> are economically enslaving us">>>> He continued as to how now the salvation has come and the>> gates have open for African Americans to come together>> behind Barack Obama, because now is the time to show>> them.(meaning thejews).>>>> He continued to speak about ' White supremacy' vs>> the talents and visionaries in the core of African>> Americans. He demeaned being given freedom, by saying>> "To what?" to a country that kills women and>> children.>>>> I could no longer be polite and sit in front of the crowd,>> so I walked out.>> Members of the fraternity ran after me as did my staff, I>> was not able to contain my tears and I cried .I cried for>> me and my family, who have tried so hard to help the>> African American community, because we adopted children>> from the same realities and wanted to give back to other>> children and people. We have been completely color blind,>> for us it was only helping those children in need. I cried>> for our beloved country and the division that Barack Obama>> has caused with his Rev. Wright opening the gates to>> 'hate' against the Jews and whites. I grew up so>> looking at America as the land of Freedom. I was honored to>> receive my citizenship accompanied by members of the Kennedy>> family. Now, I'm afraid for Israel because Barack sat>> there for 20 years listening and not standing up for>> what's right, why would he standup for Israel?>>>> I cried for the Jewish community who are so blind that they>> can't see that there's a movement here that will>> destroy us.I cried because for the first time in my life I>> was afraid of the future.>>>> I cried for our world that is moving backwards and not>> forward. Everyday, I see children so lost, and so deserving>> of hope and love. I look into their eyes, knowing that it is>> their lives that are in our hands.>>>> I'm crying now, so I'm going to stop writing>> because it is so painful.>> I just had to share this experience with you,>> thank you,>> Daphna